News
29 June 2012
GDC BC Mainland Chapter's message to non-members: WTF?
VANCOUVER—Not a member of GDC's BC Mainland Chapter? WTF?

That's what the chapter's GDCWTF initiative hopes to address, as it aims to pull in new members not only to its own chapter but across Canada. The initiative has received full endorsement from the national organization, noted Mike Cober, a GDC/BC Mainland executive and co-creator of GDCWTF along with GDC executive Darren Carcary.

 

Cober serves on the GDC/BC Mainland Chapter executive, and has been the vice president of membership since 2009 and the national representative since 2010, he said. Carcary has served on the exec since 2009 and is currently the audio-visual content chair, added Cober.

There are about 1,300 GDC members across nine chapters in Canada (with around 500 in the BC Mainland Chapter alone, according to Cober). "We hope that increased membership in all chapters would be a secondary result," he said. "We often think that life in Winnipeg is far different than it is in Vancouver, and it probably is, but many of the challenges, rewards, and interests of designers in all parts of Canada are common."

The GDCWTF website allows members to express the value of their GDC membership, and there's a bunch of benefits listed as well. "The true benefit of membership lies in being able to market yourself to your clients as a member of your national professional association which adheres to a strict code of ethics and sustainability principles," explained Cober, adding designers can add the CGD designation to their business cards after they pass a certification process.

The site also allows designers a chance to explain why they're not a member; so far the responders cite cost as a factor. One commenter stated, "To be honest I’ve thought about joining several times, but each time I stop when it asks for the $300 payment, simply because I find it personally expensive for what I feel I would actually get out of it."

Each chapter sets its own dues according to the "needs, activities and demographics of their respective chapter," noted Cober. For the GDC/BC Mainland, the annual dues for a CGD member are $330 and can be paid annually or monthly.

Cober designed the logo for GDCWTF and said the Wordpress-based website is due for a redesign soon so it's more responsive on various platforms.
33. angelo sgabellone BA/AOCA
30 July 2012 at 1:42 PM
@Toni:

Unless you are Avis or Volkswagen, rarely is a negative a good thing in institutional promotion. Try telling that to a junior?
32. Toni
28 July 2012 at 11:15 AM
@ Marga Lopez I've even heard the saying "What the Font?" really now this leaves room for people to poke fun at GDC's expense and really how can that be a good gimmick?
31. angelo sgabellone BA/AOCA
27 July 2012 at 12:50 PM
@Marga:

Good point! As a kid growing up in the late 50s we were never allowed to use the F word, so we always said "what the Frig." So there you have it, poor message, vague communication, you fill in the rest?
30. Marga Lopez
26 July 2012 at 4:32 PM
@Rick, I agree I don't want to be the one who leaves with the freak (haha, great story!) but WTF not always means the worst thing, it's an acronym and you fill in the blank, to me it means "GDC, Why The Fork?" or "GDC, Why The Font" ;)
29. Tim Edwards
25 July 2012 at 11:39 AM
I'm thinking about becoming a graphic designer and found this article on the GDC. I've read all the posts and can see both sides of your issue here.

The big question I have is this — has membership gone up significantly in BC since launching your campaign?

and

What are the ages of those that are joining?

It would be good to do a posting here or in a new article.
28. angelo sgabellone BA/AOCA
20 July 2012 at 10:12 AM
@Rick and Marga:

I think it is obvious — WTF is the difference between a junior and a professional solution. It may get attention but as a serious piece of communication it doesn't.

A knock on a door is one thing, to sell the buyer and close the deal is another. If one of my designers (junior or senior) came to me with this concept, I would send them back to his/her drawing board.
27. Rick Long
19 July 2012 at 4:58 PM
Let me give you another illustration: I was told a true story (from a trustworthy source from my parents' generation) about a guy in university who would go to all the dances and approach every woman there and only say five words to them: "I want to f____ you." People who knew what he was up to, would see him get slapped by each woman he talked to, but, eventually he would walk out with someone on his arm.

Yes, the line works, but who wants to be the one going home on the creep's arm?
26. Rick Long
19 July 2012 at 4:23 PM
@Marga,

I certainly hear what you're saying, but, as communication experts, we have to set a higher standard, we have to do better.

If "we, the experts" don't or can't, who will?

I'd love to hear the conversation between this designer and their client: "You should really put WTF into your company name so people will pay attention and trust your company with their retirement funds. What do you have to lose?"

Would you agree that it would be a very quick way to end the relationship when the client discovers the designer is serious?
25. Marga Lopez
19 July 2012 at 3:09 PM
@Rick Long. Sure there are several ways to have this message communicated, this was the BC Chapter's way to just get to the point and be noticed... I guess if you are not being heard, at some point you just stop being polite ;)
24. Rick Long
19 July 2012 at 1:47 PM
@Marga et al,

I agree with all your points most certainly and most of what I've read in the posts, my only qualms are the dismissive remarks toward "anonymous" posts, as if they carry no validity, and the use of the term WTF.

I like the videos. I understand the "wake-up and smell the coffee" attitude the site has.

I think there are classier ways to go about shaking people out of their complacency.
23. Marga Lopez
18 July 2012 at 7:42 PM
I don't think becoming a GDC member will justify your career or be the greatest return of investment to your chequebook, but for sure it will reflect how your beliefs matter to you, how you handle yourself as a practicing designer and how you are taking responsibility for the direction  your profession is headed.

The $300 fee is not an investment that you get back in your pocket, It's an investment to support what you do for a living, to protect and enhance your profession as a meaningful one — no matter whether you are a big name designer or a regular Joe working from a coffee shop.

GDC is not just a list of perks (those are gravy;) what my membership fees and certification mark means to me is that I am serious about what I do, I am putting my money where my mouth is and engaging as much as I can in what matters to me and the future of what I do for a living. To me that is ROI.

It's unfair to expect the GDC or any design association to be all of what you want it to be before you engage with it or when you are not willing to be an active contributor to help make the changes you want a reality. If your principles don't cost you, then they are not your principles.

GDCWTF actually brings all those issues up front, all the goods and the bads. It's an opportunity to engage, to dialogue and to see the points of view of your community (even if you are not a member or plan to be one). I don't think it's disrespectful. I think it gives a voice to those who earned their Fellowship with hard work and commitment to what the GDC stands for.
22. Toni
18 July 2012 at 9:44 AM
Reading this really doesn't make me want to join. I don't see what the big deal is about the GDC. Don't think I'll be spending $300 to join and I agree WTF? really that's childish.
21. angelo sgabellone BA/AOCA
17 July 2012 at 2:28 PM
A stick being banged on a tin can gets your attention as well. However, after that initial stage, what everyone has to ask; "what is the real reason to buy?" It sounds like to me, at least, there might be serious "higher level" communications problem at the GDC.
20. Tim Andrews
17 July 2012 at 10:24 AM
"The fact the GDCWTF got your attention tells me it is working..."

I don't understand this logic. Fireworks gets my attention. It doesn't mean I want to get any closer to the racket.
19. Anonymous
16 July 2012 at 11:23 AM
I couldn't agree less with Mr. Milanovic's comment. In my very early career, I tried to get away with a concept that was similar to what I had seen others use. I was quickly shut down and then taught the error of my ways by a thought-provoking and kind teacher, Burton Kramer.

And no, I shan't feel the need to give you my name.
18. Richard Long MA, AIGA,
16 July 2012 at 11:05 AM
@Randy

Your line "The fact the GDCWTF got your attention tells me it is working..." is an excuse juniors and recent students use to submit lousy work and I don't know of any other creative director who would accept such a statement to qualify nor quantify a piece of work. Try selling your line to a client sometime and see how far you get. To illustrate an example, the "money for gold" and "Loooan Arraaanger" commercials certainly are quantifiable, they "Do Work", but you're not going to see a company like TD Bank spitting one out like them.

Concerning WTF, I side with Bill Cosby and his take on vulgarities in comedy -- one of the few comedians that can make people laugh with class.

It is also very high and mighty of you to cast off ALL anonymous "votes" as you call them. People have access to too much information without needing to scrutinize what somebody's background or importance is. Case in point, I'm wondering why you didn't include all the important letters after your name: IMCP, AMMC
17. Randy Milanovic CGD
13 July 2012 at 6:21 PM
Anyone contributing as "Anonymous" may as well toss their vote. It means nothing. The fact the GDCWTF got your attention tells me it is working... let's rock GDC!
- Randy Milanovic CGD (since 1995), Creative Director at KAYAK Creative, Calgary.
16. mike
11 July 2012 at 11:59 PM
Read the article, read the comments, and I say that being a designer for the past eight-nine years,  the GDC has barely been a blip on my radar. It just seems totally irrelevant to me.

I'm busy with my job, busy chasing freelance projects, busy sitting in traffic, busy at home with the kids, busy all the time. GDC has no bearing on my professional existence as it is today. Furthermore, finding an extra $300 whilst trying to get by in the lower mainland or lower island w/ the ridiculous cost of living in these areas + other responsibilities means that membership better be goddamn impressive. From my perspective it just seems totally irrelevant.

I will readily plead ignorance to the GDC's overall significance to the design profession in Canada, however the fact, for me, remains that membership is totally irrelevant to my life. and the attitude of this campaign turns me off.
15. Anonymous
11 July 2012 at 12:21 PM
By using the term "WTF" in a campaign, the GDC is telling us that it is no longer a professional organization. Rethink this one GDC leadership! Cuz even students expect more from u.
14. Anonymous
11 July 2012 at 1:55 AM
I have to completely agree with other student/junior members — the lack of support, organization, commitment and mentoring for newbies is mindblowing. Us junior designers are the GDC's next 'wave' (in the creative sense as well as the financial sense) and yet there appears to be no real effort on the part of the executive to understand and connect with this area of revenue/talent. I'm almost insulted that the GDCBC rep who came to talk to our class (and inspired me to become a student member) pitched an 'education committee/initiative' when there clearly has been nothing new developed since his visit two years ago. He also suggested we sign up to volunteer, however It took months to get a response from anyone, regardless of whether we signed up through the GDC website, or sent direct emails to the local coordinator. Please consider how you might convince student members to upgrade their membership (for a hefty fee) once they graduate, when the only mentorship opportunities offered are available by (in the words of the rep who visited our school) "introducing yourself to one of the senior professionals at a social event" ...surely an organization of such calibre could imagine a few {more structured and proactive} initiatives, to not only nurture new talent, but to influence them in matters of ethics and professionalism.
13. Anonymous
10 July 2012 at 1:36 PM
...Actually Mark, sometimes it isn't easy. I stand behind the RGD 100%, but I get how sometimes people may feel they aren't getting the full deal, but feel that if they complain, they can't use their real name. (Consider how whistle blowers inevitably have to find a new place to work.)

Some may find they can't participate fully because they live just a little outside the big centre or the "event" is on the wrong side of the city to be able to get to in time or costs a little too much for their salary and their company won't splurge for the $$s nor the time.

If one complains out loud, it means that there are more that don't have the guts to come forward.

If you're going to own it, you have to own it from both sides.



On another note... when is the RGD going to come back under the GDC umbrella?

My name is Rick, but does knowing that really make my points any more or less relevant?
12. Mark Busse (Past President of GDCBC)
6 July 2012 at 7:55 PM
Sure is easy to throw stones when you can make up some name or click that little "anonymous" button, hey? If you have something intelligent to say, or a contrary opinion to share, then stand up and own it.

If anyone thinks that a magazine subscription is the only thing one gets with a GDC membership, then we truly have failed at communicating the benefit of belonging to the only national, federally-chartered professional design association in Canada. WTF indeed.
11. Nikole
6 July 2012 at 1:51 AM
Thank you to everyone who voiced their opinion on volunteering with the GDC/BC. My name is Nikole and I am the volunteer coordinator for the GDC/BC chapter. If anyone is interested in volunteering with the GDC/BC chapter please send me an email directly at volunteer.bc@gdc.net and I will happily have a chat with you regarding volunteering with the GDC.
10. Anonymous
5 July 2012 at 1:40 AM
$300 is too much for a magazine subscription. That's all I ever got out of being a member.
9. Adrian Jean CGD (President of the GDC)
4 July 2012 at 5:10 PM
GDCWTF was a shocker when I first heard about it. Then I saw some of the videos people had posted, and realized it's really about a statement. A statement that, by being part of a greater creative community, you add strength and a unique voice to that community, for your benefit as a professional designer, and the benefit of others in the industry.

These guys saw that spark of community in the GDC BC Mainland chapter - and other chapters and wanted to share it with the rest of the country. I suspect that sense of community is shared amongst many more designers across Canada.

You, as a designer, contribute to the greater creative community every day in some way, through your work and your passion. But the national voice of the industry needs designers like you behind it, to promote and celebrate the good work professional designers do, and the tremendous value we as skilled communicators bring to a business' bottom line. You can do it alone for yourself, or we can do it together and make real positive change for the entire industry.

GDCWTF is all about what that change means, to real designers, from coast to coast, to coast to border. Check out some of the videos, and think about how you could add your voice.
8. Darren Carcary, CGD | AV Content Chair, BC Mainland
3 July 2012 at 8:31 PM
GDCWTF is the beginning of a dialogue. It’s a forum for us to move beyond discounts and subscriptions as a membership incentive and let our members speak plainly and directly about why they choose to be members of the GDC. I'd urge you to view our member testimonials for a representation of the intangible values they find in GDC membership.

And if we aren’t getting it right, it’s also a place for you to share your concerns or questions in the Rant section.

For myself, I can only say joining the GDC has been one of the best decisions I’ve ever made professionally. But I’ve only got out of it what I’ve put into it too.

That’s not to say every member needs to join the executive to see value, but the more involved you are I think the more benefit you can realize. And the more the Canadian design community can realize.
7. Suburban Designer
3 July 2012 at 4:29 PM
Ever since graduating from Emily Carr I have considered joining the Mainland GDC, but the events I have attended left me thinking that group members just loves to navel-gaze and pat themselves on the back. Granted they host some interesting events, but it has never seemed to justify the expense. I follow the same rigorous rules of design life that they espouse and I don't feel the need to justify my existence through the GDC.
6. Anonymous
3 July 2012 at 4:19 PM
when I was a student I signed up for the BC Mainland chapter as a way to network and connect with other designers but I haven't found it very easy
I have signed up to volunteer many times http://www.gdc.net/designers/volunteer.php and also emailed the chapter directly but never heard back from anyone
I also attend GDC sponsored events as much as possible but usually only meet other struggling new grads and rarely find any senior designers who are willing to offer constructive advice
I am still a member as I want to support the organization but I wish the organization offered more for it's members
opportunities for internships, job shadowing or mentorships would be appreciated as well as the opportunity to volunteer at events
5. angelo sgabellone BA/AOCA
3 July 2012 at 12:02 PM
As a former member and as I see it, the greatest problem that both GDC and RGD have is that over the years too many inexperienced junior and intermediate designers have used it to pad their CVs. Its directors and staff need serious leadership, governance and corporate training before they can tell the rest of the industry how to conduct its business.

Their effort to attract senior designers or pivotal leaders from the industry have been somewhat lamentable. Regardless of their fees or effort.
4. Anonymous
3 July 2012 at 9:17 AM
They really have to start addressing the issue that when you ask for $300 a year from people they expect more than a coupon book (especially one that lists a FREE Design Edge Subscription as a benefit when anyone can get one free...)

I've been a designer for 10 years now in Toronto and never been a part of any association and that fact has never hurt me. Change the model and stop trying to sell something that clearly isn't working.
3. Anonymous
2 July 2012 at 8:17 PM
I was so disappointed to see the following article. This is what it's come down too? This will attract new potential professionals? WTF?
2. DesignFacet
1 July 2012 at 1:54 PM
This is a testament that they are not doing well financially and desperate to attract membership.
1. Anonymous
29 June 2012 at 2:19 PM
WTF? from a teenager texting or a professional association? Not very professional. Don't undo the respect that the fellows built for the GDC, please. THX.

Name:
Anonymous
Your Name Please!

Comment:
Editor's note: We reserve the right to edit and/or delete comments that we consider inappropriate, defamatory or malicious. Keep your comments constructive.
Comment Copy Please!

Click to refresh
Please fill in the 4-character Captcha!
Archives
Most Recent Comment
Matt says:
@angelo, Are you involved in organizing this competition? I'm not. But I can read. The beginn...
Most Recent Blog Comment
Curious George says:
Renee@ I was just about to ask to whom can you complain for working without pay. But my next questio...
Fontest
 
 
Calling all typophiles! Enter our font contest and you could win a prize
FREE Subscription

January/February 2013

Canada's largest circulation design Magazine

FREE Newsletter

Sign up now for our free news and jobs email bulletin

Live from Twitter