News
11 July 2012
Bruce Mau Design aims to change America's view of Canada
TORONTO—Beavers, Mounties, and igloos, oh my.

Those are some things that likely come to mind when Americans think about their northern neighbour, and Bruce Mau Design (BMD) is aiming to change that.

Proposed outdoor poster for 'Know Canada' campaign (click to enlarge)
Proposed outdoor poster for 'Know Canada' campaign (click to enlarge)


BMD was approached by radio program Studio 360 with Kurt Andersen (produced by WNYC Radio and Public Radio International) in the U.S. to take part in its series called Redesigns.

At the suggestion of a listener in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Studio 360 put the focus on redesigning Canada. But the "design exercise" is not really about changing Canada, said Alexis Green, marketing and PR manager at BMD, as much as it's about changing America's view of Canada.

Electronic billboards could educate Americans about the merits of Canada
Electronic billboards could educate Americans about the merits of Canada

The "Know Canada" idea (and associated website) is backed by the assertion that "Canada doesn't need a redesign as much as America needs an education," said Green. Instead of beavers, Mounties, igloos, and maple syrup, BMD wants Americans to think Pamela Anderson, Ryan Gosling, and basketball.

Since BMD has offices in Toronto and New York, "we put four or five of our American designers on the project so it would be an unbiased, fresh perspective looking at Canada," she said. "Part of our research process was interviews with a few notable Canadians including (actor/comedian) Scott Thompson and Andrew Scott (of Canadian band Sloan)."



The campaign proposes several possibilities such as an iPhone app that takes photos with two red bars framing them (like a Canadian flag), images on electronic billboards, and even a wrap on a plane.

"We'd be willing to work with any public/private institutions to make the concepts a reality," said Green. "We think it's a really strong idea."

And so does much of the Twitterverse, apparently.

"With the good comes the bad, but in terms of social media traffic, we've seen people embrace this idea," she said.
— Jeff Hayward
16. Anonymous
18 July 2012 at 5:43 PM
I think it's a good starting point for a redesign, but it's weak in execution. Slapping two red bars on either side of (mostly) a bunch of celebrities is uninspired and inaccurate. Ryan Gosling, Justin Bieber, Pamela Anderson... REALLY? They are about the most un-Canadian people I can think of. I also don't think that stating the walker or peanut butter was invented here educates an American about Canada at all. Whether we like it or not, Canadian ideologies really are best represented by cliches such as maple syrup, the beaver, hockey... Like #7 Alex says, these cliches are to be celebrated because they are truly what makes us Canadian. I feel like BMD only succeeds in upping Canada's "cool factor" in the eyes of an American by claiming Arcade Fire et al. as exports. Does it truly educate them? Not in any meaningful way.
15. angelo sgabellone BA/AOCA
18 July 2012 at 12:03 PM
Symbols, no matter what you call them, communicate in recognizable context, not forced or arbitrary relationships. We work in an applied science not the metaphysical "fine arts" fields. You just can't put things out there, because you think you can — that's not communication at any level.
14. Jim Morgan
17 July 2012 at 10:21 AM
@Any11

Identity standards are put in place for important reasons. Think about this when you're doing your next identity and standards guide. The Canadian flag certainly does have usage standards and because the flag is used on a plethora of different communication devices from travel and tourism to packaging, these standards need to be specific and enforced so that the flag is not tarnished and used in a disrespectful way. This ensures that things don't fall to the failed logic of "they did it so why can't I do it too?" or "made you look, so it must be working."

Secondly, dynamic identities are great, but they're currently a fashion trend in design, similar to when Quark back in the early 90's offered colour editing... for a while there, everything was rainbows and gradations because everybody was doing it and again similar to the fake drop shadow. There has to be good and solid design reasoning to use dynamic identities and hopefully moving forward something comes out of what BMD has done, but currently, I think we're looking only at the appetizer.
13. A Thompson
16 July 2012 at 10:41 PM
Here is a case where a design shop wants to be all things to all people and they can't. Advertising and design are two different beasts requiring two different mindsets. All you designers here are cooing over a shop that has taken the maple leaf out of the Canadian identity but the "sell" falls short. I'm not saying BMD is not skilled, they're skills are not what the project requires. Send this job to a John St. or Grip or reThink and then look at the product. I think you'll see a huge difference.
12. Ben
16 July 2012 at 5:52 PM
Anon8

Anonymous #2 and #5 here — just going to consolidate.

I'm pretty clear on what a dynamic identity is, but simply putting things inside a shape doesn't cut it. I can't say it any more concisely than #9 has so I won't bother.

Citing city rankings is absurd, they change every year on top of being completely biased and arbitrary (what is "innovative?")
11. Anonymous
16 July 2012 at 3:49 PM
@Any9

Really? You're going to say that you can't use the flag in this way because the government says so? And you're saying that you can't use dynamic identity systems for brands that aren't famous? I guess that kills Melbourne's ID, MIT Media Lab, Brooklyn Art Museum, Museum of Art and Design.... to name a few award winning systems for entities that are NOT as famous as CANADA!

By the way BMD was one of the first firms to use dynamic identity with NAi so I think it's fair if it applies the concept here.

The execution isn't sharp (But I read it was a fast project) but the concept is smart. If you think it sucks... do better.
10. Scott Christie
16 July 2012 at 10:37 AM
What a clever, simple idea. Powerful. One of those: wish I had thought of it ideas.
9. Anonymous
16 July 2012 at 10:18 AM
@Any8

As far as "dynamic identity" is concerned, Coke has a long history in front of the eyes of the world both in design and in advertising. People can identify the Coke brand or Nike swoosh as easily as they can breath air. Canada, on the other hand, is trying to educate Americans who may or may not be able to identify the Canadian flag as quickly as they identify a bottle of Coke.

Secondly, this little "dynamic branding" exercise sets a poor precedent on the use of the flag in advertising (look it up):

"The national flag and representations of it should always be shown, represented or used in a dignified manner. It should not be defaced by way of printing or illustrations or masked by other objects, but displayed in a manner which may be described as aloft and free, in which all symbolic parts of the flag can be identified." (from the GOC website).

Tell me when you look at the photo of Margaret Atwood with red boxes on either side of her head you can't hear Darth Vader whispering: "Luke, Luke! I AM your father!"
8. Anonymous
14 July 2012 at 11:26 AM
@Alex Toronto is the 10th most innovative city in the world. Montreal, Quebec, Vancouver, and Calgary are also in the top 100. Get informed.

@Anonymous It's called 'dynamic identity' look it up... Starting with Coke Side of Life. Get educated.
7. Alex
13 July 2012 at 11:36 AM
Canada is an interesting country to visit. But innovation-wise, we are weak, so we don't make much of a mark on the global impression beyond travel + tourism. When the world thinks of Canada, what icons, symbols and impressions have WE embedded in people's minds? I'm Canadian and have travelled around the world. I can tell you what IS unique to Canada is our lakes, the concept of cottaging, maple syrup yes, canoes yes, and cold weather yes, mountains and green spaces, lobster traps, bilingualism, we have aboriginals yes, and we ice fish. No one should poo-poo these. We should LOVE these. If people come here looking for that, great. When they discover everything else, fantastic. Why do you go to Japan? Why do you go to Italy? Every country has its cliches and stereotypes in people's minds — because they come from somewhere. We don't need a rebrand. We need to leave the country to realize that everything people think about Canada is true about Canada — and there is nothing wrong with it. But we do need to innovate and stop being complacent. Let's create, not follow. Let's be a country that dares, not just cares. Then maybe we won't have to "educate" American about Canada.
6. Anonymous
13 July 2012 at 11:13 AM
@any5

lol, your point about being a recycled OCAD campaign... too true.

I would think Americans that aren't aware of what our flag looks like will look at Margaret Atwood or Stephen Harper or David Suzuki and say: "What up with the red Princess Leia earmuffs??!"

I have other questions too:
Where is the maple leaf?
What's next?
Where do we go from here?
Do Americans get it?
What are they supposed to do if/when they do get it?

After going through the presentation and website again, it isn't a tourism campaign at all — it really is only a branding exercise.
5. Anonymous
13 July 2012 at 9:34 AM
Anon4.

I see your point in theory, but I'm still unclear on why we as Canadians should care whether Americans take the time to understand our culture, history or achievements (whether we're visiting them or vice versa). It's not a lack of patriotism at all, I'm simply confused why anyone would feel their national pride galvanized because the USA finally "gets it." We have a lot to be proud of as Canadians it's true, this project — a recycled version of the OCAD identity isn't one of them.
4. Anonymous
12 July 2012 at 4:55 PM
@Any2

  It's hard to imagine Americans wanting to come north of the border, but enough Canadians head south at all times of the year that pandering to the American tourist dollar only seems right. Anyone watching Rick Mercer's "Talking to Americans" regarding their "little brother to the north" will soon realize even some of the most intelligent Americans (watch the Harvard clip on YouTube) believe that once they cross the border, they need to wear parkas, X-country skiis or snowshoes and that the police force ride horses and wear silly red jackets!

Using strong Canadian assets is actually very logical — not ridiculous as you seem to believe. If you look at some of the other things Canadians can be proud of, I'm sure there are some things that Canadians don't realize came from Canada.

I'm finding too many Canadians are apathetic when it comes to Canadian patriotism.
3. Doug
12 July 2012 at 4:27 PM
OK, agreed, we could skip Pamela Anderson.
2. Anonymous
12 July 2012 at 3:47 PM
This is kind of ridiculous, first of all, who cares what Americans think or know about Canada? And suggesting that they get to know us by our contributions to pop culture is pedantic at best. Pamela Anderson? Come on, and every woman on the planet knows that Ryan Gosling is Canadian, ask them if they care.
1. Doug
11 July 2012 at 8:44 PM
Quite love it! [] √ []

Name:
Anonymous
Your Name Please!

Comment:
Editor's note: We reserve the right to edit and/or delete comments that we consider inappropriate, defamatory or malicious. Keep your comments constructive.
Comment Copy Please!

Click to refresh
Please fill in the 4-character Captcha!
Archives
Most Recent Comment
Anonymous says:
I'm not a fan of this new re-design. Like they say if it works don't change it....
Most Recent Blog Comment
Curious George says:
Renee@ I was just about to ask to whom can you complain for working without pay. But my next questio...
Fontest
 
 
Calling all typophiles! Enter our font contest and you could win a prize
FREE Subscription

January/February 2013

Canada's largest circulation design Magazine

FREE Newsletter

Sign up now for our free news and jobs email bulletin

Live from Twitter