News
11 July 2012
Bruce Mau Design aims to change America's view of Canada
TORONTO—Beavers, Mounties, and igloos, oh my.
Those are some things that likely come to mind when Americans think about their northern neighbour, and Bruce Mau Design (BMD) is aiming to change that.
BMD was approached by radio program Studio 360 with Kurt Andersen (produced by WNYC Radio and Public Radio International) in the U.S. to take part in its series called Redesigns.
At the suggestion of a listener in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Studio 360 put the focus on redesigning Canada. But the "design exercise" is not really about changing Canada, said Alexis Green, marketing and PR manager at BMD, as much as it's about changing America's view of Canada.
The "Know Canada" idea (and associated website) is backed by the assertion that "Canada doesn't need a redesign as much as America needs an education," said Green. Instead of beavers, Mounties, igloos, and maple syrup, BMD wants Americans to think Pamela Anderson, Ryan Gosling, and basketball.
Since BMD has offices in Toronto and New York, "we put four or five of our American designers on the project so it would be an unbiased, fresh perspective looking at Canada," she said. "Part of our research process was interviews with a few notable Canadians including (actor/comedian) Scott Thompson and Andrew Scott (of Canadian band Sloan)."
The campaign proposes several possibilities such as an iPhone app that takes photos with two red bars framing them (like a Canadian flag), images on electronic billboards, and even a wrap on a plane.
"We'd be willing to work with any public/private institutions to make the concepts a reality," said Green. "We think it's a really strong idea."
And so does much of the Twitterverse, apparently.
"With the good comes the bad, but in terms of social media traffic, we've seen people embrace this idea," she said.
Those are some things that likely come to mind when Americans think about their northern neighbour, and Bruce Mau Design (BMD) is aiming to change that.
|
Proposed outdoor poster for 'Know Canada' campaign (click to enlarge)
|
BMD was approached by radio program Studio 360 with Kurt Andersen (produced by WNYC Radio and Public Radio International) in the U.S. to take part in its series called Redesigns.
At the suggestion of a listener in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Studio 360 put the focus on redesigning Canada. But the "design exercise" is not really about changing Canada, said Alexis Green, marketing and PR manager at BMD, as much as it's about changing America's view of Canada.
|
Electronic billboards could educate Americans about the merits of Canada
|
The "Know Canada" idea (and associated website) is backed by the assertion that "Canada doesn't need a redesign as much as America needs an education," said Green. Instead of beavers, Mounties, igloos, and maple syrup, BMD wants Americans to think Pamela Anderson, Ryan Gosling, and basketball.
Since BMD has offices in Toronto and New York, "we put four or five of our American designers on the project so it would be an unbiased, fresh perspective looking at Canada," she said. "Part of our research process was interviews with a few notable Canadians including (actor/comedian) Scott Thompson and Andrew Scott (of Canadian band Sloan)."
The campaign proposes several possibilities such as an iPhone app that takes photos with two red bars framing them (like a Canadian flag), images on electronic billboards, and even a wrap on a plane.
"We'd be willing to work with any public/private institutions to make the concepts a reality," said Green. "We think it's a really strong idea."
And so does much of the Twitterverse, apparently.
"With the good comes the bad, but in terms of social media traffic, we've seen people embrace this idea," she said.
Most Read Stories
Most Recent Comment
![]() |
|
| Anonymous says: | |
| I'm not a fan of this new re-design. Like they say if it works don't change it.... | |
Most Recent Blog Comment
![]() |
|
| Curious George says: | |
Renee@ I was just about to ask to whom can you complain for working without pay. But my next questio... |
|
Blogs
![]() |
Do Good D̶e̶s̶i̶g̶n̶ David Berman Most recent posts: |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Design school didn’t tell you... Mark Busse Most recent posts: |
Design Buzz on the Web
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Fontest
Calling all typophiles! Enter our font contest and you could win a prize |
FREE Subscription
|
||
FREE Newsletter
Sign up now for our free news and jobs email bulletin |
![]() |
Live from Twitter





.jpg)


Identity standards are put in place for important reasons. Think about this when you're doing your next identity and standards guide. The Canadian flag certainly does have usage standards and because the flag is used on a plethora of different communication devices from travel and tourism to packaging, these standards need to be specific and enforced so that the flag is not tarnished and used in a disrespectful way. This ensures that things don't fall to the failed logic of "they did it so why can't I do it too?" or "made you look, so it must be working."
Secondly, dynamic identities are great, but they're currently a fashion trend in design, similar to when Quark back in the early 90's offered colour editing... for a while there, everything was rainbows and gradations because everybody was doing it and again similar to the fake drop shadow. There has to be good and solid design reasoning to use dynamic identities and hopefully moving forward something comes out of what BMD has done, but currently, I think we're looking only at the appetizer.
Anonymous #2 and #5 here — just going to consolidate.
I'm pretty clear on what a dynamic identity is, but simply putting things inside a shape doesn't cut it. I can't say it any more concisely than #9 has so I won't bother.
Citing city rankings is absurd, they change every year on top of being completely biased and arbitrary (what is "innovative?")
Really? You're going to say that you can't use the flag in this way because the government says so? And you're saying that you can't use dynamic identity systems for brands that aren't famous? I guess that kills Melbourne's ID, MIT Media Lab, Brooklyn Art Museum, Museum of Art and Design.... to name a few award winning systems for entities that are NOT as famous as CANADA!
By the way BMD was one of the first firms to use dynamic identity with NAi so I think it's fair if it applies the concept here.
The execution isn't sharp (But I read it was a fast project) but the concept is smart. If you think it sucks... do better.
As far as "dynamic identity" is concerned, Coke has a long history in front of the eyes of the world both in design and in advertising. People can identify the Coke brand or Nike swoosh as easily as they can breath air. Canada, on the other hand, is trying to educate Americans who may or may not be able to identify the Canadian flag as quickly as they identify a bottle of Coke.
Secondly, this little "dynamic branding" exercise sets a poor precedent on the use of the flag in advertising (look it up):
"The national flag and representations of it should always be shown, represented or used in a dignified manner. It should not be defaced by way of printing or illustrations or masked by other objects, but displayed in a manner which may be described as aloft and free, in which all symbolic parts of the flag can be identified." (from the GOC website).
Tell me when you look at the photo of Margaret Atwood with red boxes on either side of her head you can't hear Darth Vader whispering: "Luke, Luke! I AM your father!"
@Anonymous It's called 'dynamic identity' look it up... Starting with Coke Side of Life. Get educated.
lol, your point about being a recycled OCAD campaign... too true.
I would think Americans that aren't aware of what our flag looks like will look at Margaret Atwood or Stephen Harper or David Suzuki and say: "What up with the red Princess Leia earmuffs??!"
I have other questions too:
Where is the maple leaf?
What's next?
Where do we go from here?
Do Americans get it?
What are they supposed to do if/when they do get it?
After going through the presentation and website again, it isn't a tourism campaign at all — it really is only a branding exercise.
I see your point in theory, but I'm still unclear on why we as Canadians should care whether Americans take the time to understand our culture, history or achievements (whether we're visiting them or vice versa). It's not a lack of patriotism at all, I'm simply confused why anyone would feel their national pride galvanized because the USA finally "gets it." We have a lot to be proud of as Canadians it's true, this project — a recycled version of the OCAD identity isn't one of them.
It's hard to imagine Americans wanting to come north of the border, but enough Canadians head south at all times of the year that pandering to the American tourist dollar only seems right. Anyone watching Rick Mercer's "Talking to Americans" regarding their "little brother to the north" will soon realize even some of the most intelligent Americans (watch the Harvard clip on YouTube) believe that once they cross the border, they need to wear parkas, X-country skiis or snowshoes and that the police force ride horses and wear silly red jackets!
Using strong Canadian assets is actually very logical — not ridiculous as you seem to believe. If you look at some of the other things Canadians can be proud of, I'm sure there are some things that Canadians don't realize came from Canada.
I'm finding too many Canadians are apathetic when it comes to Canadian patriotism.