News
3 October 2012
GDC accepting proposals to redesign its identity and branding
The Society of Graphic Designers of Canada (GDC) is looking for a new identity — and is asking for proposals from design firms or freelancers that want to create it.

The national design association has put out an RFP for a new identity system and brand platform "to help strengthen the Society's strategic planning process, produce an overall increase of awareness and contribute to a more easily managed program to better reflect the Society's personality and values."

The catch is, the GDC is asking that firms do the work on a pro-bono basis ("reasonable" expenses will be reimbursed). In return, the winning firm will be recognized as a GDC partner for a minimum of two years, according to RFP guidelines.
To be considered for the project, the GDC wants to know about the candidate's working relationship with clients (namely why it's successful), and is asking for samples of corporate identity work from the past three years.

The deadline for the RFP submission is Oct. 28. The RFP states at least one senior member of the project design team must be a CGD certified member of the GDC. Designers with other designations (R.G.D., SDGQ, AIGA) are allowed, but they must partner with a CGD-certified designer.

"As this is the identity for the GDC, we are restricting the project to GDC members only, much like we do with our annual report," noted Matt Warburton, GDC's national vice president of communications.

The GDC's goal is to present the new identity to GDC's national council in April 2013, with the approved work to be completed and presented at the national annual general meeting in 2014.

The current GDC logo has been in place since 1968, noted the organization. 
11. Matt Warburton
11 October 2012 at 3:32 PM
@Anonymous 9 (gotta love people who criticize but won't use their names). The GDC is a volunteer run organization with very limited financial resources. We have a secretariat to pay for, our accountant, and lately legal fees we have to pay hard cash for. We are very well aware of the value of this project which is why we're specifically asking for people to take it on as a Pro Bono project. I like Mike Teglas' suggestion of lifetime recognition and will certainly discuss that with the Communications Committee. We have a huge network of designers who volunteer on many committees to contribute to furthering their profession and the GDC across Canada. We're hoping to tap into that same enthusiasm and altruism with this project. I will personally buy copious quantities of beer for the team or designer that takes this on!
10. Matt Warburton
10 October 2012 at 10:12 PM
@Dave Watson. It's more than just the identity Dave, its the entire brand environment. The logo is un-identifiable, especially with the federal government style typography we use. Helvetica has served us well since Burton Kramer used on the first applications in 1968, so that might be continued. We are known as "GDC" yet the identity does not say that except in a very abstract manner (look closely, that's what our logo is). The design team could come back and tell us the current logo is fine, its just the "world" that it lives in that needs work. That's part of the challenge.
9. Anonymous
10 October 2012 at 7:22 PM
I do agree that this seems a little wrong.. Although it's not technically spec work, this pro-bono model does seem to be hypocritical considering the GDC's values of encouraging designers to get paid for the work they do. One of the recommendations I might make if I were to rebrand the GDC is to do away with this model as it contradicts what my impression of the GDC is. The GDC is the LAST org I thought I'd see this kind of free design work request from.
8. Dave Watson
10 October 2012 at 6:04 PM
Am I the only one that thinks the current identity for the GDC is great as is? What's the point?
7. Matt Warburton
10 October 2012 at 2:43 PM
Thanks Rick. Trust me when I say I know how demanding designers and the GDC can be! But we've had so much success with the ARs that I'm sure everyone will be equally receptive to any new identity and brand we develop.
6. Rick Thomas
10 October 2012 at 2:25 PM
@Matt Warburton
I love your work and always have.

I do not doubt the GDC will be kind and generous and yes, very demanding. My point regarding designers being critical is not toward the GDC itself, nor the board, it is the uncouth amongst the members and non-members, en masse, after the approval of the board and the displaying of the new creation, that will critique without restraint.

And your point regarding pro-bono/spec work... Point taken. Thank you for the clarification.
5. Matt Warburton
10 October 2012 at 10:48 AM
This is definitely NOT spec work. We are asking for interested firms/designers to submit their qualifications and samples of existing work. We are not doing a call for design proposals or concepts which is what spec is. We will then choose one firm to do the project. We've used the same model for our award-winning annual report for years and its been a win-win for the designers and the GDC. @Rick Thomas, it is an incredibly demanding client!!! If you look on our site you'll see that we support Pro-Bono scenarios as that structure guarantees a respectful and productive working relationship, where the value of the designers work is fully acknowledged and not abused.
4. R Barrett
10 October 2012 at 2:33 AM
Why isn't this considered spec work? Wouldn't GDC know better than most about the importance of designers getting paid what they're worth?
3. No Thanks
10 October 2012 at 1:36 AM
Sorry, as the GDC recommends — I DON'T DO SPEC WORK, especially for free!
2. Mike Teglas
9 October 2012 at 6:48 PM
Same here. It stinks of speculation work. Pro Bono, as I understand it RFPs from a client usually have a budget. Only two years as a recognized partner? Should be lifetime if it's for free.

Why are not the members doing it themselves?
1. Rick Thomas
9 October 2012 at 3:59 PM
Unfortunately, I wouldn't touch this one with a ten foot (3m) pole! No offense, but designers as a group have to be "the Most Critical of Blokes." I would estimate that a majority will heap scalding blasphemes upon any design that is put forward.

...and, the work is pro-bono to boot?! I thought the GDC fought against pro-bono work?

Name:
Anonymous
Your Name Please!

Comment:
Editor's note: We reserve the right to edit and/or delete comments that we consider inappropriate, defamatory or malicious. Keep your comments constructive.
Comment Copy Please!

Click to refresh
Please fill in the 4-character Captcha!
Archives
Most Recent Comment
Matt says:
@angelo, Are you involved in organizing this competition? I'm not. But I can read. The beginn...
Most Recent Blog Comment
Curious George says:
Renee@ I was just about to ask to whom can you complain for working without pay. But my next questio...
Fontest
 
 
Calling all typophiles! Enter our font contest and you could win a prize
FREE Subscription

January/February 2013

Canada's largest circulation design Magazine

FREE Newsletter

Sign up now for our free news and jobs email bulletin

Live from Twitter