News
15 January 2013
Ontario town hopes branding can help bury bad image
The municipal logo, currently the town's only official iconography

The current logo
PORT HOPE, ON—A lakeside town just over 100 kilometres east of Toronto has a reputation for radioactivity. Its name, Port Hope, is often associated with the low-level radioactive waste buried beneath, the result of radium and uranium refining dating back to 1933.

The ongoing cleanup effort is the largest of its kind in Canadian history according to the Toronto Star, and along with cleaning the waste comes an effort to scrub the town's image.

To position itself as "an urban-rural paradise powered by strength of character," Port Hope launched a branding project last year, including community consultation stages to involve its residents in the process.

Three logos designed by Toronto studio Weave Communications are in the running for Port Hope's new community mark, which will be made available to local businesses and organizations. Also, three Weave refreshes on the current municipal logo, implemented in 2001 after Port Hope's amalgamation with Hope Township and currently the town's only iconography, are options for a new corporate logo.

The proposed designs were shown at an open house on Dec. 12, 2012 to collect community feedback. 

"There was a lot of requests from the business community and our residents to do a branding that would position Port Hope in a positive light," said Sandra Weeks, Port Hope communications coordinator. "We have a lot of really positive things happening in the community, and we want to make sure that gets out there," she said.

There were 23 bidders for the job, which Weave secured with a price tag of $102,830. According to a Northumberlandtoday report, the lowest bidder quote was $9,750, and the highest was $271,000. The project entails research through interviews, focus groups and surveys; a report of research findings; a positioning statement; development of visuals and an open house presentation; and development of a communications strategy, implementation plan, and identity manual.

Below are the ideas behind Weave's proposed visuals, according to info available for download on the town's website. Weave Communications declined to comment, as the project is not yet completed.

The 'ExtraOrdinary' logo emphasizes that X marks the spot
The 'ExtraOrdinary' logo emphasizes the X-factor

The "ExtraOrdinary" word mark aims to capture two sides of Port Hope: sophisticated and sensible, and casually offbeat. According to the project's graphic concepts package, the stylized X can be used as a standalone icon in phrases such as "X marks the spot."

A proposed logo gives Port Hope a stamp of approval
A proposed icon to give Port Hope a stamp of approval

The "100% Port Hope" image is meant to appear as a stamp of approval, signifying pride. "We cherish everything about Port Hope - good, bad and quirky, it's what makes us who we are," says the package.

A reversed R aims to show the town's
A reversed R is coupled with a thought bubble

The "Port Hope Thought Bubble" features a backwards letter R to position the town as unconventional. The comic book-style thought bubble aims to give the word mark a "thoughtful" and "witty" personality. The copy in the bubble can be replaced to convey different information.

Three proposals for Port Hope's corporate logo
Three proposals for Port Hope's corporate logo

The corporate logo options are new versions of the older logo, with simplified colour palettes and different frame choices. They feature larger type to make them easier to read in different iterations, Weeks said. "If you made the old logo small enough, you can't even read that part of it," she said.

Feedback on the logos will be collected until Jan. 25 and taken into account, but ultimately the decision is city council's. "They were the ones who approved the project to go forward, so they would be the the ones who would make the final decision," Weeks said.
— Jef Catapang
39. DAvid Antscherl, ADC, RGD Emeritus
8 February 2013 at 9:33 AM
This must be April 1. Oh, it isn't? I was naive enough to think that this article was a spoof. Sigh.
38. Marcus Fox
4 February 2013 at 10:43 AM
Ouch!!! $102.830, in sterling thats £65,000, the cost of a senior creative for 12 months not twelve hours. These logos look like they were put together in an afternoon using publisher with little or no thought or creative skill involved, its a rather sad reflection that so called designers can get away with such poor work, and I dont feel blaming the client is relevant they are just poor on every level!!!
37. Derek K
3 February 2013 at 11:12 PM
These look like they're fresh from a crowdsourcing contest. Sorry Port Hope but all "hope" is lost with these designs. Comic Sans....really?
36. John Elsegood
3 February 2013 at 9:55 AM
Looks like clipper and a few extras for $102,830. Wow that would set most small agencies up and they would have got a better job. Would have been a better idea to give everyone a few dollars in that place and told them to tell a friend how nice the place is.
35. William JA Wallace, The Brand Architect
1 February 2013 at 12:08 PM
I don't believe in the 'buy local' argument. To me that's like Christians who hire only Christians. If my kid needs brain surgery, I go for the best, not the 'local' nor those that belong to my club. Port Hope got hosed, plain and simple. There is no happy ending to this story. Take the logo that Ottawa paid thousands for that looks like an aerial view of a toilet flushing. As designers we have to keep our ethics high, even if others do not. Just sayin'.
34. Jay Robinson
25 January 2013 at 10:13 AM
As a creative professional for more than 20 years backed up by a design education (ACAD 96'), I can say nothing positive about ANY aspect of this ENTIRE project. These "designs" wouldn't pass a first year crit. Like mama says, "If you don't got sometin' nice to say..." whatever mama. Weak work, Weak Creative Weak Approach = Weak Results. I think these two words sum it up: "No Comment"...
33. Anonymous
24 January 2013 at 5:34 PM
As a designer of over ten years, I was honestly shocked when I saw these concepts. I have to question whether Port Hope did any research in looking for right fit in designers and if Weave was truly up for this level of design. It really is unfortunate that it got to this point when clearly this was not the right client / designer fit.
32. Irina D
23 January 2013 at 1:17 AM
Wow... These designs are terrible! Comic Sans, old college t-shirt or a kid's toy? Really? I'm a young designer and even I know that you are only as good as your worst design. And I wouldn't put the blame on the client. It is the designer's responsibly to create imagery that not only respects the client's guidelines, but also respects the viewer, which in this case, is the whole community of Port Hope, while being pleasing to the eye. I certainly hope that Port Hope will not get tricked into accepting any of the logos seen above or any other designs of poor quality, may it be from Weave of anyone else.
31. Anonymous
21 January 2013 at 12:11 AM
I recently pitched on an account that was outside of Toronto, and the potential client informed me that their decision to go local was mainly based on their experiences in the past dealing with "bigshot" Toronto firms, and not getting enough attention and what they thought was quality output.

Now it all makes sense. Port Hope, I hope you stand up and say something about this.
30. sid
18 January 2013 at 1:42 PM
@ R Polutnik

The whole bidding process is a bit of a game and Weave was able to sell themselves to Port Hope. Backing up the sell is another thing. Maybe this is the kind of creative that won the account, then Port Hope should be happy with these.

We've all made compromises on designs before, and we can blame the client as much as we want. In the end it's the designer who decides what is worthy to present.
29. R Polutnik
18 January 2013 at 9:26 AM
Why should Weave be the only ones held accountable? Who selected Weave from all the submissions? Who did the short list interview with Weave? Who provided direction and approval to Weave. Shouldn't they also be held accountable. Do you really believe that Weave produced everything on their own without client input.
28. sid
18 January 2013 at 12:28 AM
@ anon 27
Donate a logo (worth $100K of work here) because they got bad designs from the hired firm?

That's insulting to all designers and shows how little you value our work.

Do you ask for free food at one restaurant because you had a bad meal at another? Support local by paying the local designer $100K.
27. Anonymous
17 January 2013 at 9:56 AM
I've got a excellent idea, I'm sure a lot of wonderful designers will read this article. Since Port Hope is  most likely spent the whole budget for the options above. Donate a better logo for them. because these are so sad and why would they not want to help their own community. STAY LOCAL!
26. context
17 January 2013 at 9:55 AM
Did anyone from Weave actually come to Port Hope? Certainly didn't see them at the open house presentation. These designs show no understanding of the town and are devoid of the "passion" that someone who actually lives here might have added to a design. They look like clip art that could be used by any town. Next time Shop Local.
25. Anonymous
16 January 2013 at 11:16 PM
Port Hope deserves a full refund. Juniors can do the work...seniors should vet it. Surprise that a Toronto firm got the nod as Port Hope has very successful Design and Communication companies. People who live and work in the town would have a better perspective.
24. Joel Scott
16 January 2013 at 9:52 PM
I've lived in the area most of my life and Port Hope is a beautiful town with a passionate spirit and a considerable arts community. I was shocked to hear that the town chose to go out of market for this project. With a contract of this magnitude, a local firm could've provided far better vision. These images are embarrassing. Shop local is the motto for this vibrant community - was sad to see the town didn't "Shop Local".
23. Jennifer Gustar
16 January 2013 at 9:39 PM
I am so disappointed that these logos reflect none of the character, charm and beauty of Canada's most beautiful town. What are they supposed to convey that will have any positive effect on rebranding Port Hope? Could the designers provide an explanation that demonstrates some relationship between the town and the logos? These strike me as cliche, bland and utterly devoid of character—so unlike the town they will represent. And in one case, the last one, somewhat senseless, in that it makes no sense. Not funny.
22. Anonymous
16 January 2013 at 2:03 PM
$100,000 for designs that use standard fonts and MINOR variations of existing branding?


21. Wilf Day
16 January 2013 at 12:34 PM
The strange thing is, the design firm did an excellent job on the community branding Positioning Statement, below. And then released these hopeless logos.

"Port Hope is anything but ordinary. It happily goes its own way. Port Hope is an urban-rural paradise powered by strength of character. Heritage architecture, industry and culture nestle in a river valley extending through miles of striking natural landscapes. Port Hope’s secret ingredient is its people – an eclectic mix of passionate individuals who protect the community’s unique appeal. They love life, celebrate individuality, challenge the norm and deliver the unexpected." And challenge unexpected logos.
20. Anonymous
16 January 2013 at 12:17 PM
PH would be smart to opt-out, and cut its losses now and start over.
19. Elwira Wozniak
16 January 2013 at 12:12 PM
Wow. Just.. wow.
18. Andrew Hall
16 January 2013 at 12:05 PM
As a graphic designer and brand consultant, I am often faced with having to explain what a "brand" really is. Put simply, a brand is the connection and company has with its clients. I would argue that Port Hope already has a connection with its citizens and even some of the outside world. But, it needs to be strengthened and focused, and this effort comes from within. The logo is a visual element that best represents that brand. Whether the brand is "home," "family," "happiness," "community," or whatever, the logo is the visual cue that instantly brings all those thoughts and feelings to the forefront of the mind.

In my humble opinion, it takes a while for a logo to truly represent a brand, especially when the brand is shifting and the logo is new. But, I can't see how any of the three "new" logos (which could have been easily generated by online logo-creating software) is ever going to connect the public with the beautiful town of Port Hope.

Certainly, this output is just not commensurate with a $102K contract. Better results could have come from a local company that knows Port Hope well, and likely at a fraction of the cost.
17. Justin
16 January 2013 at 11:44 AM
Weave must think the "Stamp" design is the winner here, and they whipped up two obvious losers plus updated the original, so it looks like there is a choice. Heaven forbid the committee likes one of the "wrong" designs.
16. Anonymous
16 January 2013 at 11:06 AM
Two words: Comic Sans.
15. Anonymous
16 January 2013 at 10:55 AM
The fact that the "committee" responsible for approving this did as such, shows the hoi poloi need a bigger voice in projects like this. Outsourcing was a bad decision in the first place as Port Hope has a plethora of professionals living right here in town. SHAME
14. Anonymous
16 January 2013 at 10:43 AM
Good luck to you Port Hope.
13. Nancy, Design Edge editor
16 January 2013 at 9:41 AM
Anon. 11: This story has been reported on by Toronto Star, local newspaper NorthumberlandToday and the logo designs are up on the official town of Port Hope website, so it is not a prank. Links to the three are in the story.

Anon. 10: DesignEdgeCanada.com's policy is to objectively report on Canadian design news. We do not comment on the quality of the design presented. In this instance, we felt the story was important as an example of what one client received in terms of design for the amount of money spent.
12. Ben
16 January 2013 at 9:26 AM
Okay so this makes the Saskatchewan redux almost a contender for rebrand of the year.

None of these show even the slightest amount of thought, I'd love to have been in that presentation room though, that must have been something to behold.
11. Anonymous
16 January 2013 at 9:24 AM
Wow... is this a prank to draw interest?
10. Anonymous
15 January 2013 at 11:50 PM
Note to self, build networking plan, quality of work no longer matters. And in all seriousness, designedgecanada needs to begin vetting out these kinds of stories. There is nothing constructive to discuss here.
9. David Coates, CGD, FGDC
15 January 2013 at 9:38 PM
I'm completely at a loss for words. It's really hard to be constructive in this situation. It seems to me this community has been dealt enough (radioactive) shit over the years to be exposed to this unfortunate selection. What a tragedy.
8. Anonymous
15 January 2013 at 5:45 PM
I weep for the future of the industry! Comic Sans? You've got to be kidding me! @ Anon 5, I totally agree with you!
7. sid
15 January 2013 at 5:08 PM
People may argue that you don't know what went on with the client and this is the result of (insert reason here)

There is no excuse for these logos. These should never have even been presented.
6. Kyle K
15 January 2013 at 4:40 PM
These are by far and away the worst logos I have ever seen. Ever.

This has to be a joke?
5. Anonymous
15 January 2013 at 3:53 PM
 I bet that the person bidding for $9000 would have done a better job.
4. Anonymous
15 January 2013 at 3:22 PM
Did Weave Communications seriously just propose Comic Sans and a backwards R? No wonder they declined to comment.
3. johnsonstarfish
15 January 2013 at 3:06 PM
Wow... just wow. I can't believe that these are actual choices. They look like student options from a first year corporate design class. And the price tag for these? I'm at a loss for words...
2. Anna Avery
15 January 2013 at 2:38 PM
I am blown away by these proposed logos. Just blown away...
1. Sebastian Abboud
15 January 2013 at 1:59 PM
Ok, wait... Hold on a second. "ExtraOrdinary" in Comic Sans must be part of a lavish prank? A $102,830 joke?

Name:
Anonymous
Your Name Please!

Comment:
Editor's note: We reserve the right to edit and/or delete comments that we consider inappropriate, defamatory or malicious. Keep your comments constructive.
Comment Copy Please!

Click to refresh
Please fill in the 4-character Captcha!
Archives
Most Recent Comment
Matt says:
@angelo, Are you involved in organizing this competition? I'm not. But I can read. The beginn...
Most Recent Blog Comment
Curious George says:
Renee@ I was just about to ask to whom can you complain for working without pay. But my next questio...
Fontest
 
 
Calling all typophiles! Enter our font contest and you could win a prize
FREE Subscription

January/February 2013

Canada's largest circulation design Magazine

FREE Newsletter

Sign up now for our free news and jobs email bulletin

Live from Twitter