News
15 January 2013
Ontario town hopes branding can help bury bad image
|
The current logo |
The ongoing cleanup effort is the largest of its kind in Canadian history according to the Toronto Star, and along with cleaning the waste comes an effort to scrub the town's image.
To position itself as "an urban-rural paradise powered by strength of character," Port Hope launched a branding project last year, including community consultation stages to involve its residents in the process.
Three logos designed by Toronto studio Weave Communications are in the running for Port Hope's new community mark, which will be made available to local businesses and organizations. Also, three Weave refreshes on the current municipal logo, implemented in 2001 after Port Hope's amalgamation with Hope Township and currently the town's only iconography, are options for a new corporate logo.
The proposed designs were shown at an open house on Dec. 12, 2012 to collect community feedback.
"There was a lot of requests from the business community and our residents to do a branding that would position Port Hope in a positive light," said Sandra Weeks, Port Hope communications coordinator. "We have a lot of really positive things happening in the community, and we want to make sure that gets out there," she said.
There were 23 bidders for the job, which Weave secured with a price tag of $102,830. According to a Northumberlandtoday report, the lowest bidder quote was $9,750, and the highest was $271,000. The project entails research through interviews, focus groups and surveys; a report of research findings; a positioning statement; development of visuals and an open house presentation; and development of a communications strategy, implementation plan, and identity manual.
Below are the ideas behind Weave's proposed visuals, according to info available for download on the town's website. Weave Communications declined to comment, as the project is not yet completed.
|
The 'ExtraOrdinary' logo emphasizes the X-factor
|
The "ExtraOrdinary" word mark aims to capture two sides of Port Hope: sophisticated and sensible, and casually offbeat. According to the project's graphic concepts package, the stylized X can be used as a standalone icon in phrases such as "X marks the spot."
|
A proposed icon to give Port Hope a stamp of approval
|
The "100% Port Hope" image is meant to appear as a stamp of approval, signifying pride. "We cherish everything about Port Hope - good, bad and quirky, it's what makes us who we are," says the package.
|
A reversed R is coupled with a thought bubble
|
The "Port Hope Thought Bubble" features a backwards letter R to position the town as unconventional. The comic book-style thought bubble aims to give the word mark a "thoughtful" and "witty" personality. The copy in the bubble can be replaced to convey different information.
|
Three proposals for Port Hope's corporate logo
|
The corporate logo options are new versions of the older logo, with simplified colour palettes and different frame choices. They feature larger type to make them easier to read in different iterations, Weeks said. "If you made the old logo small enough, you can't even read that part of it," she said.
Feedback on the logos will be collected until Jan. 25 and taken into account, but ultimately the decision is city council's. "They were the ones who approved the project to go forward, so they would be the the ones who would make the final decision," Weeks said.
Most Read Stories
Most Recent Comment
![]() |
|
| Matt says: | |
| @angelo, Are you involved in organizing this competition? I'm not. But I can read. The beginn... | |
Most Recent Blog Comment
![]() |
|
| Curious George says: | |
Renee@ I was just about to ask to whom can you complain for working without pay. But my next questio... |
|
Blogs
![]() |
Do Good D̶e̶s̶i̶g̶n̶ David Berman Most recent posts: |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Design school didn’t tell you... Mark Busse Most recent posts: |
Design Buzz on the Web
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Fontest
Calling all typophiles! Enter our font contest and you could win a prize |
FREE Subscription
|
||
FREE Newsletter
Sign up now for our free news and jobs email bulletin |
![]() |
Live from Twitter








.jpg)


Now it all makes sense. Port Hope, I hope you stand up and say something about this.
The whole bidding process is a bit of a game and Weave was able to sell themselves to Port Hope. Backing up the sell is another thing. Maybe this is the kind of creative that won the account, then Port Hope should be happy with these.
We've all made compromises on designs before, and we can blame the client as much as we want. In the end it's the designer who decides what is worthy to present.
Donate a logo (worth $100K of work here) because they got bad designs from the hired firm?
That's insulting to all designers and shows how little you value our work.
Do you ask for free food at one restaurant because you had a bad meal at another? Support local by paying the local designer $100K.
"Port Hope is anything but ordinary. It happily goes its own way. Port Hope is an urban-rural paradise powered by strength of character. Heritage architecture, industry and culture nestle in a river valley extending through miles of striking natural landscapes. Port Hope’s secret ingredient is its people – an eclectic mix of passionate individuals who protect the community’s unique appeal. They love life, celebrate individuality, challenge the norm and deliver the unexpected." And challenge unexpected logos.
In my humble opinion, it takes a while for a logo to truly represent a brand, especially when the brand is shifting and the logo is new. But, I can't see how any of the three "new" logos (which could have been easily generated by online logo-creating software) is ever going to connect the public with the beautiful town of Port Hope.
Certainly, this output is just not commensurate with a $102K contract. Better results could have come from a local company that knows Port Hope well, and likely at a fraction of the cost.
Anon. 10: DesignEdgeCanada.com's policy is to objectively report on Canadian design news. We do not comment on the quality of the design presented. In this instance, we felt the story was important as an example of what one client received in terms of design for the amount of money spent.
None of these show even the slightest amount of thought, I'd love to have been in that presentation room though, that must have been something to behold.
There is no excuse for these logos. These should never have even been presented.
This has to be a joke?